Compacts 'do not always lead to harmony'

By Ben Cook, Third Sector Online, 28 August 2008

Compacts cannot be relied upon to ensure an effective relationship between government and the voluntary sector, according to a new report.

The study - Agreeing to Disagree: Maintaining Dissent in the NGO Sector, by think tank the Australia Institute - also concluded that compacts do not "guarantee the legitimacy" of the community sector.

Gemma Edgar, a research fellow at the institute and author of the report, researched existing compacts, including the UK agreement. She concluded that compacts could not be "relied upon to ensure an effective and respectful long-term relationship between government and NGOs - these things will occur only if NGO advocacy is recognised as a legitimate and valuable element of public debate".

The Australian government - led by prime minister Kevin Rudd - is currently consulting with NGOs about the development of a compact by 2009.

Edgar said: "While the Rudd government's desire to build bridges with the community sector should be applauded, any decision to enter into a formal compact needs to be carefully considered by both sides."

X

You must log in to add to your Storage Folder

All Comments Make a comment

carl allen

carl allen, 28 August 2008, 11:26

Law is not a guarantee of order.

Freedom is constantly won.

Independence is fiercely guarded.

Difference is a source of value and conflict.

So what is new ?

[Report this post]

One Small Voice?

One Small Voice?, 28 August 2008, 15:38

You're becoming increasingly cyptic Mr Allen!

[Report this post]

You must log in to comment on articles.

You are reading Third Sector Daily, the free breaking news bulletin that delivers the top stories affecting charities, voluntary organisations and social enterprises every working day.

You must be logged in to make full use of all the site content and features.

Related articles