Enjoy Third Sector in print - Subscribe to get your personal copy every week

Latest jobs

  • Receive Jobs by Email
  • RSS
 

Jobs of the week

Funding and Development Manager, ARK Schools
Highly Competitive Remuneration, Central London
Fundraising Manager, NFP Resourcing
£27829 - £37281 per annum, Leicestershire
Major Donor Manager, Prospectus
£30,000 - £33,000,
Marketing & Events Manager, Shoreditch Town Hall Trust
£28k - £30k, Shoreditch
Institutional Giving Officer, Prospectus
£13/14 ph,
 

Famous names

Daniel Roche

"I like frogs and toads"

Daniel Roche supports environmental organisation Wren's Biodiversity Action Fund

Clothing partnerships 'are harming public confidence'

By Kaye Wiggins, Third Sector, 1 September 2009

Association of Charity Shops warns of 'potentially fatal' loss of support

Public confidence in door-to-door clothing collections is being "potentially fatally undermined" by partnerships involving charities that do not run stores, according to a report by the Association of Charity Shops.

In a survey of the public carried out in June for the report, 44 per cent of the 1,000 respondents said they had received more clothes collection sacks in the past year than in the previous 12 months, and a third of these said they were "annoyed" as a result.

The rise was due largely to an increase in the number of commercial partnerships between charities that do not have shops and private collection companies, the report claims.

Under such deals, commercial firms distribute clothing collection sacks with the charity's logo and give the charity a proportion of the profit made from the sale of the clothes.

"Public trust and confidence in house-to-house collections are being undermined, potentially fatally, by commercial partnerships," the report says. "Consumers want their donations to benefit charities only."

The report also says the rise in commercial collections has led to a 27 per cent fall in the revenue raised by some charity shops from clothing donations during the past 12 months.

Fifty-three per cent of the respondents who had received more collection sacks had donated either the same number of items or fewer, so there was no increase in income to make up for sharing donations between more organisations, the report concludes.

It also says charities in commercial partnerships do not receive a fair amount of the money raised by the sale of donated clothes.

"Charities in these partnerships will receive between £50 and £100 per tonne," it says. "Sales of that same tonne of textiles in a charity shop will raise between £2,500 and £4,000."

Lekha Klouda, director of the ACS, said commercial organisations and charities that did not run shops should be more transparent about how much of the money raised from the clothes would go to the charities.

Elliot Cohen, director of commercial collection firm I & G Cohen, said the clothes were sold for £500-700 a tonne. "We donate £50 per tonne to the charity and that is clearly stated on the collection sacks," he said. "This is half our profit.

"I agree the proliferation of sacks is damaging public confidence, but the real problem here is the bogus collectors and thieves.

"The Government needs to legislate against these so that charities can benefit from clothes collections."

X

You must log in to add to your Storage Folder

All Comments Make a comment

One Small Voice?

One Small Voice?, 1 September 2009, 13:12

"Public trust and confidence in house-to-house collections are being undermined, potentially fatally, by commercial partnerships," the report says. "Consumers want their donations to benefit charities only."

Are the authors of said report offering to do the collecting themselves for nothing then!?

We need to stop pandering to public ignorance about charities and explode the damaging myth that nobody should ever get paid anything.

Most people are fairly savvy consumers in all other aspects of life so we need to grasp the nettle and explain to them that there's nothing 'magic' about charity status.

[Report this post]

David Moir

David Moir, 2 September 2009, 10:45

As the “author”, I am a little puzzled by TS Member’s comments. No-one is suggesting there are no legitimate collection costs involved, for charities with shops and commercial collectors alike.

The point is that charity shops which collect house to house ensure the maximum amount possible from the sale of donated goods goes to charity.

By contrast, commercial collectors pass on only a very small proportion of what they make to charity. This is not made clear to potential donors. It’s this lack of transparency about the diversion of money to commercial collectors’ profits that could turn the public off house to house collections.

The public would simply rather see proceeds from their donations go to charity than to private gain.

[Report this post]

You must log in to comment on articles.

You are reading Third Sector Fundraising. The latest news, campaigns and initiatives by UK charities and voluntary organisations.

You must be logged in to make full use of all the site content and features.