Charitable giving reforms could lead to huge boost in donations, says Centre for Policy Studies report

Two key changes 'could bring in up to £74bn more'

Reforms to charitable giving could boost donations from the "reasonably well-off" by up to £74bn, according to a new report.

Paul Palmer, professor of voluntary sector management at Cass Business School, suggests two changes that he says could unlock 10 per cent of the £740bn held by the 820,000 Britons with a net wealth of more than £500,000 in assets beyond the family home, such as pension funds.

In the paper, A Step Change in UK Philanthropy, published by the Centre for Policy Studies, Palmer recommends enabling individuals to set up ‘remainder trusts' for £50,000 or more. These would be similar to charitable trusts but able to be controlled and accessed by donors, permitting tax-free income generated from the trust to be distributed to good causes.

The other idea is to create a new type of charity, called a personal charitable trust, based on US and Canadian models and which allows donors to retain anonymity. These would also benefit from light-touch regulation and be free of many of the reporting burdens imposed on larger charities.

Palmer said the reforms addressed the "u-curve problem" – the fact people at the extremes of wealth are the most generous – by making giving more attractive to those in the middle.

The total income of general charities in 2006-7 was £33.2bn, according to the lastest Civil Society Almanac, published by umbrella group the NCVO.

Kate Youde recommends

Cass Business School

Read more

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus