Download the Third Sector iPad edition

Charity Commission investigates charity that owes £1.3m to firm owned by trustees

Nita Kinesiology owes the money to Opal Bay, whose directors are Mark and Anthony Rubin, the two trustees of the charity

Charity Commission
Charity Commission
The Charity Commission is investigating a charity that owes nearly £1.3m to a company run by its two trustees.

The Essex-based charity Nita Kinesiology was registered in 2006 and works to relieve sickness and protect and promote the health of people living in the UK.

The charity’s most recent accounts, for 2011, show that its income was more than £970,000 and that it paid £700 to charitable causes.

The accounts also show that the charity owes nearly £1.3m to a company called Opal Bay. According to the accounts, both of the charity’s two trustees, Mark and Anthony Rubin, are directors of Opal Bay.

A Charity Commission spokeswoman said the commission was carrying out an investigation into the charity to establish "whether the trustees can demonstrate that the charity is operating in furtherance of its object for the public benefit and whether transactions entered into by the charity were in the best interests of the charity".

A statement from Mark Rubin said the level of donations made by the charity, which is named after his late mother, had been low because it was struggling financially. He said that when Nita Kinesiology was established the trustees had invested more than £1m in property to create an income for the charity that it could then donate to good causes.

"The idea was to sell the property after two years and then have a substantial sum available to create legacies as and when," he said.

However, because the property market crashed the charity has used all of its resources "to pay the bank its due", which was why the level of donations made by the charity was so low, said Rubin.

He said that neither of the trustees were paid by the charity and no public money had been put at risk by the charity’s actions.

"The only potential loser is a family company that provided the original seed monies," said Rubin. "Sadly, the whole thing has become a disaster, far from for the original altruistic ideals that we had."

The commission spokeswoman said the investigation into Nita Kinesiology, which opened on 1 November 2011, was continuing.

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +

Latest Jobs

Forthcoming Events

Leadership in Campaigns

  • Tue 3 Nov 2015 - Wed 9 Dec 2015
  • London

Finance and Performance Management for Grantmakers

  • Thu 17 Dec 2015
  • London
RSS Feed

Third Sector Insight

Sponsored webcasts, surveys and expert reports from Third Sector partners


Expert Hub

Advice on risk from a specialist insurer

Managing cyber risk in the third sector

Liam Greene of Markel explains why cyber risks should be high on the risk management agenda of third sector organisations as incidents hit the headlines with increasing frequency


Expert Hub

Fundraising advice from BT MyDonate

Five low cost tips for creating compelling video content that thrives

No matter what size your budget, there are some simple tips that can help keep costs down