Compact in action: Independence from the state

A new report finds charities do not believe the Compact is useful in protecting their autonomy.

A report on voluntary sector independence reveals that charities are making little use of the Compact to repel threats to their autonomy.

Sources of Strength, published by the Baring Foundation, analyses what is threatening charities' independence and the mechanisms they have at their disposal to respond. It is based on the views of organisations that applied to Barings' Strengthening the Voluntary Sector grants programme, which was relaunched in 2006 to support initiatives that help to improve charities' independence from the state.

The headline findings focused on how many charities underestimate their level of dependency on the state until funding is withdrawn (Third Sector, 21 February).

Although this caused concern, the report went on to highlight the strategies that charities follow to retain their sovereignty. The most popular of the 14 options listed was improving their professional skills; the least popular was making better use of the Compact. The report says that the lack of regard for the Compact suggests that an overwhelming number of charities do not believe it is a useful tool to repel external threats to their independence.

"Just 7 per cent said they could make better use of the Compact in negotiating with government funders, although the breadth of the Compact's scope means it was probably highly relevant to many of the problems reported by organisations," the report says.

However, it cites the introduction of Compact Plus and the appointment of John Stoker as Compact Commissioner as developments that might make a difference.

Cathy Pharoah, director of research consultancy Third Sector Prospect, which conducted the research, says: "Charities don't realise how much use they could make of the Compact."

Do charities ignore the Compact because they think it's ineffective?

"That didn't come through in the research," says Pharoah. "What did come through was that they don't have time to think about developing strategies.

"In their busy day-to-day schedules, organisations don't pay enough attention to tackling things in a strategic way. They are fire-fighting most of the time."

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +

Latest Jobs

RSS Feed

Third Sector Insight

Sponsored webcasts, surveys and expert reports from Third Sector partners

Markel

Expert Hub

Insurance advice from Markel

Cyber and data security - how prepared is your charity?

With a 35 per cent rise in instances of data breaches in Q2 and Q3 last year, charities must take cyber security seriously

Third Sector Logo

Get our bulletins. Read more articles. Join a growing community of Third Sector professionals

Register now