London Councils urged to rethink cut to borough grants scheme

London Voluntary Service Council and the Voluntary Sector Forum say maintaining this funding should be a priority

Peter Lewis, the chief executive of LVSC
Peter Lewis, the chief executive of LVSC

London Voluntary Service Council and the Voluntary Sector Forum network are calling on London Councils to rethink plans to reduce its voluntary sector grants programme by £16.5m over two years.

The grants committee at London Councils, which represents London’s 33 local authorities, last week voted to reduce the size of its £26.4m London borough grants scheme by almost two-thirds.

The budget will fall to £17.6m in 2011/12. A heavier reduction had been feared but councillors agreed to award transitional funding to give organisations time to adapt.

The budget for the following year will decline to £9.9m if no further transitional funding is awarded.

If the changes are ratified by the council’s leaders committee on 14 December more than 200 voluntary organisations will lose funding. They include Age Concern London, the Prince’s Trust and Barnardo’s.

Borough councils will be free to use the saved funds for any purpose they want.

Peter Lewis, the chief executive of LVSC, said: "This scheme was set up to help the poorest Londoners through targeted London-wide programmes meeting identified need.

"At a time of cuts to key public services, London Councils should be prioritising funding for this programme, which serves some of the most disadvantaged Londoners. Leaders should not be retaining funds to fill potholes in their own boroughs."

Front-line services supporting children and young people, the homeless and people at risk of crime could end if the cuts go ahead.

Sam Mauger, the chair of VSF, which represents voluntary organisations funded by London Councils, said: "London Councils is dismantling a scheme that has been a beacon of excellent delivery to London’s communities."

Steve Bullock, chair of the grants committee, said transition funding "would allow boroughs more time to establish which servives they should continue to fund and give them flexibility to decide what will work best in their own local areas".

 

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +

Latest Jobs

RSS Feed

Third Sector Insight

Sponsored webcasts, surveys and expert reports from Third Sector partners

Markel

Expert Hub

Insurance advice from Markel

Cyber and data security - how prepared is your charity?

With a 35 per cent rise in instances of data breaches in Q2 and Q3 last year, charities must take cyber security seriously

Third Sector Logo

Get our bulletins. Read more articles. Join a growing community of Third Sector professionals

Register now