New lottery games could cost sector £77m a year

Good causes could lose a further £77m of lottery money a year in the run-up to London 2012 as a result of lottery players switching to new games set up to fund the Olympics.

New lottery scratchcards
New lottery scratchcards

The sum will deal a substantial blow to arts and heritage charities in particular. They already face a loss of up to £100m over the next four years because of the Government's second raid on lottery distributors in March.

The impact of new games such as Lucky Dog scratchcards, which were launched specifically to raise money for Olympics projects, was revealed during an Olympics debate in the House of Lords last week.

Lord Evans of Temple Guiting, the Government's spokesman for culture, media and sport, said: "Non-Olympics good causes may lose on average about 5 per cent of their income as a result of sales diversion."

In April, the National Lottery announced it had raised £20bn of good cause money since it started in 1994. This amounts to an average of £1.54bn a year - 5 per cent of which is £77m.

Lord Evans added: "When the Olympic Park is sold, money will come back to the lottery." The Government has promised to release details on the return of profits to lottery distributors soon.

Conservative peer Lord Kenneth Baker called the second Olympics raid "an act of larceny".

He pressed the Government to give similar tax breaks to those enjoyed by donors in the US to private sector philanthropists who are donating money to bridge the funding shortfall for good causes.

"Every $60 given to a cultural organisation in America is worth $100," said Baker.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus