The Sorp revision: Simpler Sofa, shorter Sorp?

By finance expert Don Bawtree

Don Bawtree
Don Bawtree

The proposed new draft charities Statement of Recommended Practice was accompanied by 25 consultation questions: but respondents are encouraged to add their own suggestions.

Two questions might be of particular interest to non-accountants. First, does anyone understand the current Statement of Financial Activities? The committee that developed the Sorp says that having multiple columns is important to ensure proper administration and stewardship. But a simpler Sofa would be easier to read, would look like other accounts and might be cheaper to produce.

Second, should the Sorp be a one-stop shop - a guide to all charity accounting? Or should it be a very specific, shorter, more technical document, cross-referring to FRS 102 only where necessary? The latter would leave the regulators to provide general guidance separately.

Both questions need answers from non-specialists, as well as enthusiastic accountants. The answers could result in a simpler Sofa and a shorter Sorp - but would that mean better?

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus