Download the Third Sector iPad edition

Why charities might have underperformed in 2011

Charities may not have had a very good year in 2011, but they should be wary of making big changes because of that in 2012, says John Hildebrand of Investec Wealth & Investment

John Hildebrand
John Hildebrand

At one point in 2011, charities were facing losses on their investments of more than 10 per cent, but by the end of the year equities had rallied and, including their rise this year, charitable funds are back in positive territory.

In addition, many charities will have seen gains in their income of more than 10 per cent. So was 2011 a good year for charities?

The first difficulty many charities will have faced is in their fixed-interest assets. As noted by Bill Gross of Pimco, the largest fixed-income manager in the world, government bonds yielding less than 3 per cent are expensive. The trouble with calling the end of a bull market, where yields on 10-year gilts have fallen from 13 per cent to 2 per cent in the past 20 years, is that markets can stay expensive for a long time. With interest rates unlikely to rise soon, yields still look attractive compared with cash.

We focus on where we see value, so we are currently invested in corporate and short-dated bonds. These produced a return in 2011 of about 7.5 per cent, or less than half the return of gilts. So a charity with 20 per cent of its benchmark in bonds might have lagged behind its benchmark by 1.5 per cent. Was this a good result? On a long-term view, probably yes, but it still means the charity's fund manager might have to explain why it is behind the benchmark.

Similarly, many charities that invest abroad tend to concentrate on the growth markets of the Far East and emerging markets, and do not match the heavy US weighting of 57 per cent in the FTSE World Index ex-UK. As the US market rose over the year and emerging markets fell heavily by more than 18 per cent, every 1 per cent a fund invests in emerging markets rather than the US hurts that fund's performance by 0.2 per cent compared with its benchmark.

So 2011 will not have been a great year for most charities, with many losing money. However, the reasons they have underperformed are understandable and those charities that have held their nerve will, over a 14-month period, have seen rises in their income and capital. Indeed, the risk is that a charity, looking at its 2011 results, decides to move more in favour of government bonds and ends up hindering its ability to grow its capital and income in the future.

John Hildebrand is an investment manager at Investec Wealth & Investment.

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +

Latest Jobs

Forthcoming Events

Leaders in Fundraising

  • Tue 14 Apr 2015
  • ILEC Conference Centre, London

Big Donor Summit 2015

  • Wed 15 Apr 2015
  • ILEC Conference Centre, London

Digital Edge

  • Thu 16 Apr 2015
  • ILEC Conference Centre, London

Leaders In Fundraising

London, 14 April 2015

Big Donor Summit

London, 15 April 2015

RSS Feed

Third Sector Insight

Sponsored webcasts, surveys and expert reports from Third Sector partners

Markel

Expert Hub

Advice on risk from a specialist insurer

Flooding - a bigger risk than ever

As winter approaches, Wendy Cotton of charity insurance specialist Markel explains how you can protect your charity against damage by flooding

How to reduce theft at your charity

Maximising security on your premises, using deterrents such as SmartWater and ensuring computer systems are secure can all prevent a theft occuring, says Wendy Cotton, a charity insurance expert at Markel