Editorial: It's a good idea to revisit the code on elderly donors

Even though a recent complaint regarding an elderly donor was not upheld, the Fundraising Standards Board was right to recommend new rules on dealing with older people, writes Stephen Cook

It's clear that the FRSB has put its finger on a weakness in the Code of Fundraising Practice, writes Stephen Cook
It's clear that the FRSB has put its finger on a weakness in the Code of Fundraising Practice, writes Stephen Cook

In one of its rare stage-three adjudications, the Fundraising Standards Board has not upheld a complaint that the veterinary charity the PDSA took advantage of an elderly donor who was suffering from schizophrenia and made a number of substantial donations to it. The charity did not know that she was vulnerable and there was no evidence that it had put her under pressure to give, the FRSB ruled.

But it also recommended that the Institute of Fundraising, which draws up the Code of Fundraising Practice and associated guidance that the FRSB uses for its decisions, should look again at the question of fundraising from elderly people. It called for a new section of the code on working with the elderly, similar to the existing one on working with children, and the provision of guidance to help fundraisers identify vulnerable adults.

The IoF says that its standards committee will want to consider these recommendations, engage with its members and ensure any guidance reflects best practice. Behind the scenes there will no doubt be sighing and rolling of eyes from those in the fundraising world who see no need for the FRSB: the tension between the IoF and the FRSB - a necessary tension, perhaps - is always there.

But it's clear that the FRSB has put its finger on a weakness in the code and that the IoF should act. Older people are the biggest givers, not least through legacies, and receive a lot of attention from fundraisers. At the moment the code has only passing references to the elderly and is inconsistent - it refers to vulnerable adults in public collections, for example, but not in other kinds of fundraising.

One difficulty arises over how fundraisers should identify vulnerable adults when using methods other than face-to-face. You can't buy a list, and it would be impractical for charities to proactively check the vulnerability of all donors over a certain age. Another issue is that family members anxious to inherit can be over-sensitive about big parental donations. But difficulties such as these don't mean nothing can be done.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in

Latest Jobs

RSS Feed

Third Sector Insight

Sponsored webcasts, surveys and expert reports from Third Sector partners


Expert hub

Insurance advice from Markel

How bad can cyber crime really get: cyber fraud #1

Promotion from Markel

In the first of a series, we investigate the risks to charities from having flawed cyber security - and why we need to up our game...

Third Sector Logo

Get our bulletins. Read more articles. Join a growing community of Third Sector professionals

Register now