Funding programmes 'must be more Compact-compliant'

The Government must overhaul the majority of programmes that provide funding for the voluntary sector to make them more Compact-compliant, the Commission for the Compact has warned.

Research carried out by the commission showed that more than 60 per cent of central government funding programmes have failed to provide full cost recovery. From 41 programmes identified by the commission, just 16 aimed for full cost recovery for voluntary sector organisations.

Approaching half of the programmes, 19, also failed to provide the recommended minimum three-year funding, the report said.

“The approach to covering overheads, full costs and core costs and providing full cost recovery was inconsistent and unclear across and within departments,” the report said.

Making applications and assessing progress in this area was “very difficult”, it concluded, because of “unhelpful guidance and unclear language” in many cases.

The commission also said that the study was retrospective, and it recognised that progress had been made in tackling some of the issues, including the Government’s pledge to make three-year funding the norm.

A spokesman for the Cabinet Office admitted there was work to be done but said the Government was taking action.

“We know that the language of the Compact can be confusing, which is why the third sector review calls for a need to bring the Compact and its codes fully up to date,” he said.

He added that the Cabinet Office would be working with the Commission for the Compact to ensure a “more thorough implementation” of the agreement.

Andy Ricketts recommends

Commission for the Compact

Read more

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus