Landmark NGO costs ruling paves way for appeals

Mathew Little

More charities will be able to mount legal challenges to government decisions following a landmark decision in the Court of Appeal.

The Government agreed last week to conduct a full public consultation about a controversial decision to change anti-bribery rules on arms exports because of a challenge by environmental NGO the Corner House.

Its decision came on the eve of a High Court judicial review which Corner House was only able to bring because the Court of Appeal had made a 'protective costs order', ensuring that even if Corner House lost it would not be liable for costs.

It is the first time that a full protective costs order has been awarded to an NGO and will create a precedent for other voluntary organisations seeking to challenge government actions. The Appeal Court will publish the reasons for its decision shortly.

Susan Hawley, policy analyst at the Corner House, commented: "We could not have afforded to take the legal action without it. This is a major breakthrough, especially for small NGOs."

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus