More local infrastructure bodies expect to merge in the next year, Navca survey finds

Fifteen per cent of respondents say they expect merger, up from 9 per cent in 2012

Navca
Navca

The proportion of local infrastructure bodies that are expecting to merge in the next year has risen in the past 12 months, a survey by the umbrella body Navca has found.

The survey, which received responses from 102 infrastructure organisations – about a third of Navca’s members – found that the proportion of those that said they expected to merge in the next year had risen from 9 per cent in 2012 to 15 per cent this year.

Sixty per cent said they did not plan to merge and the other 25 per cent said they did not know.

The report containing the figures says that although uncertainty about merging had fallen from 2011, when 43 per cent said they did not know whether they would merge, "comments suggest that there is an appetite for merging and for closer partnership working, albeit with numerous practical difficulties".

"As well as organisational mergers, members reported looking at other ways to increase collaboration, including joint working, shared posts and merging areas of work," the report says.

According to the report, more than half of respondents said they were supporting the local implementation of social value legislation introduced last year, but only 2 per cent said that there was a "good, joined-up approach" between the voluntary sector and commissioning bodies.

The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012, which came into effect earlier this year, requires commissioners of public services to take into account of "economic, social and environmental wellbeing" when seeking to purchase services from suppliers. 

Most chief officers said that social value was either in its early stages or "patchy". A further 38 per cent said that there was local approach.

Charging for membership and services was another key issue: 58 per cent of respondents said that charging for their services was an important income stream and 63 per cent said they had a charging policy.

But many said they were concerned by the ability of smaller voluntary organisations to pay, and there was unease about charging for core support services, the report says.

Carol Harris recommends

Navca

Read more

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +

Latest Jobs

RSS Feed

Third Sector Insight

Sponsored webcasts, surveys and expert reports from Third Sector partners

Markel

Expert Hub

Insurance advice from Markel

Digital fundraising tips and tricks

Digital fundraising tips and tricks

Partner Content: Presented By Markel

Third Sector Logo

Get our bulletins. Read more articles. Join a growing community of Third Sector professionals

Register now